Dr. Vincent E. Larson,
Atmospheric Science Group, Department
of Mathematical Sciences
University of Wisconsin ---
Milwaukee
A numerical model that ignores
subgrid variability has biases in certain microphysical and thermodynamic
quantities. The biases are important because
they are systematic and hence have cumulative effects. Several types of biases are discussed in
this talk. Namely, numerical models
that employ convex autoconversion formulas underpredict drizzle formation
rates, and numerical models that diagnose liquid water content and temperature underpredict
these latter quantities. The biases
arise when grid box average values are substituted into formulas valid at a
point, not over an extended volume. The
existence of these biases can be derived from Jensen's inequality.
To assess the magnitude of the biases, the authors
analyze observations of boundary layer clouds.
Often the biases are small, but the observations demonstrate that the
biases can be large in important cases.
The biases could be largely eliminated by accounting for subgrid variability
using simplified probability density functions (PDFs).