Space and time scales in the oceans

E. Linacre and B. Geerts

10/'97

Data given by Linacre (1), summarised in Table 1.1 of the present book and expanded in Table A below, show typical timescales and spatial dimensions of various atmospheric processes. Corresponding figures have been given by Abbott et al. (2) for processes within the oceans (Table B). It is interesting to conmpare the atmospheric and marine data.

Table A. Scales of atmospheric processes

scale

domain

relevant features of the atmosphere

typical horizontal dimension

typical duration

rate* (m/s)

global

Earth

solar radiation, general circulation

20,000km

1 month

7.7

synoptic

continent

frontal weather, weather forecasting, tropical cyclone

1,000km

3 days

3.9

mesoscale

region

thunderstorm, seabreeze

50km

4 hours

3.5

toposcale

locality

a thermal, cumulus cloud, rainfall

2km

1 hour

0.6

microscale

site

irradiance, evaporation, cloud physics, gusts

10m

1 minute

0.2

* the rate is calculated as typical horizontal dimension divided by duration; it is a measure of advection velocity causing the change

Table B. Scales of oceanic processes (2).

processes

typical horizontal dimension

duration

rate (m/s)

deep ocean ‘conveyor circulation’

10,000 km

30 years

1.1 x 10-2

ENSO

1,000 km

3 years

1.1 x 10-2

upwelling, eddies

10 km

30 days

3.9 x 10-3

turbulent diffusion

100 m

1 day

1.2 x 10-3

turbulent mixing

1.0 m

2 hours

1.4 x 10-4

dissipation

0.1 m

15 minutes

1.1 x 10-4

 

The rates in Table B are much slower than those in Table A. Across all scales, atmospheric processes are about 3 orders of magnitude faster than those in the oceans. This is essentially because the air density about 1,000 times less than that of water. Also, both in the atmosphere and in the ocean, larger-scale phenomena tend to evolve and/or move faster.

 

References

(1) Linacre, E.T. 1992. Climate Data & Resources (Routledge) p.12.

(2) Abbott et al. 1996. Marine biotic responses to environmental change and feedbacks to climate. In Houghton et al. 1996, 483 - 516 (3).